An Open Table where Love knows no borders

No Restraint Shown

A sermon on 1 Thessalonians 1:1-10 & Matthew 22:15-22 by Nathan Nettleton
A video recording of the whole liturgy, including this sermon, is available here.

In the past couple of weeks, the world has watched on, horrified, as events have unfolded in Israel and Gaza. Having just been in Israel myself in late June, for me it feels like a near miss. But I think for many of us, there is a feeling that these conflicts are coming uncomfortably close. We have been feeling anxious about the war in Ukraine for some time, and now this one has pushed that one from the headlines, but potentially making it worse as a result. And as they layer one on top of the other, our anxiety increases.

At the end of our second bible reading, the Apostle Paul spoke of us needing to be rescued from the fury that is coming, and the feeling that there is a fury building up that is threatening to engulf our whole world is palpable. I don’t for a moment think that Paul was foretelling the present events in Gaza, but he was talking about precisely this sort of thing.

Part of what makes the conflict in Gaza so terrifying is the sense of total lack of restraint, of all the brakes coming off. Hamas is brutal terrorist group, not too dissimilar in aims and style from ISIS. For the most part, they are hated by the Palestinian people they claim to represent almost as much as they are hated by Israel. Their recent unexpected attack on Israel was a sick and depraved act of mass murder, targeting mostly civilians. It was the largest mass murder of Jewish people on a single day since the Holocaust. It was utterly inexcusable.

It was not, however, utterly inexplicable. It’s impossible to excuse it, but it’s not impossible to explain it. Hamas can exploit the anger of the Palestinian people to its own sick ends because there is a lot of understandable Palestinian anger and despair to be exploited. 

The Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands has been accompanied but a level of brutal repression that, paradoxically, is now regarded as inspirational by many of the extreme-right organisations in the world. Neo-nazis may be as anti-semitic as ever, but they love the way that Israel normalises and defends the creation of an ethno-nationalist state, and they’d certainly like a piece of Israel’s capacity to maintain international support while doing it. White supremacism and Jewish supremacism are two forms of the same thing, and Israel has perfected the methodology that enables it.

Now we in Australia can certainly not claim to occupy any sort of moral high ground here, for we too were pioneers in the occupation of other people’s lands and of systems of apartheid to maintain it, and even just this last weekend, when we were invited to take a significant step in facing up to that sorry history and turning things around, we diminished ourselves in the eyes of the world by hardening our hearts and refusing the invitation with a resounding “No”.

One of the architects of that refusal, the leader of the federal opposition, also gave us fresh evidence this week of the ongoing international support that Israel enjoys, seemingly regardless of how they behave, when he urged Israel to respond without restraint, saying “There must be no restraint shown to those who showed no restraint themselves in committing these vicious and vile acts of terrorism.” (source)

There are our worst fears described right there – an escalation of the world’s conflicts to the point where all sides perpetrate horrendous violence without restraint, seemingly intent on at least matching each other’s brutality. God save us from the furious wrath that is coming.

You see, what the leader of the opposition has described and encouraged there is exactly the mechanism by which the world’s wrath is stirred up to such a terrifying level of fury. When each side determines to at least match the violence and brutality of the other, it always escalates. Just like two schoolboys trading punches, what each perceives as nothing more than measured and equal reciprocation is inevitably perceived by the other as escalation, as an over-reaction which must now itself be avenged with another more fearsome strike.

What Jesus calls us to do is to treat others as we would wish them to treat us. What the leader of the opposition has called for is for treating others as we believe they have treated us. What Jesus calls us to do de-escalates conflicts. The alternative inevitably escalates them.

Strangely enough, the words we heard from Jesus tonight about giving to Caesar what is Caesar’s may have initially been heard by his hearers that day as sounding a lot like the the words of the leader of the opposition, at least until he completed the second half of his sentence. You see, Caesar was another leader of a hated foreign occupation force, and when Jesus got them to hold up a coin bearing Caesar’s image, and then told them to give it back to Caesar if it was Caesar’s, it could well have been initially heard as meaning “pay back Caesar in his own coin”, a common idiom in many languages and cultures for pay back, for doing to others what they have done to us.

But then Jesus immediately subverts that idea by calling us to pay back God in kind too, to live not as those who bear the image of the emperor, but as those who are created in the image of a loving, merciful, non-violent God.

Jesus points us to the mechanism of change, to the way of escape that he provides us from the coming furious wrath, and indeed, the Apostle Paul talks about this mechanism too. When Jesus asks us to think about whether we are acting in the image of the brutal emperor of the occupation powers, or in the image of God, he is asking us to consider who we are modelling ourselves on, who we are imitating.

When we act without restraint towards those who have acted without restraint, we are in fact imitating our enemies, we are modelling ourselves on them. Whatever they do, we imitate and do back. And when we model ourselves on our enemies, we become just like our enemies. In fact, we become our enemies, or at least the indistinguishable mirror image of them. This is the mechanism that drives the escalation to extremes that we so fear. The cycle of violence and vengeance is driven by our modelling of our actions on the worst actions of those who have acted against us. We imitate one another. We must avenge and then they must avenge and then we must avenge again and every round escalates a little further, without restraint.

The problem is though, that we can’t simply choose to not imitate. Imitation of one another is hard-wired into us. It is how we learn, how we decide what to wear, how we work, how we develop as human beings. The question is not whether we will imitate; it is who we will imitate. The only way we can stop imitating our enemies, and becoming more and more like them, is by choosing an alternative, by deliberately modelling ourselves on someone else instead.

This is exactly what following Jesus is all about. When we talk about following Jesus, that’s what we are talking about. We are not talking about walking from Galilee to Jerusalem and back because that’s where Jesus went. We are explicitly talking about imitating him, about modelling our behaviours and our patterns of response to others on his ways. When we are not sure how to respond in a given situation, we are talking about seeking to discern what Jesus would do in this situation, and imitating that, modelling our response on his.

And at its best, this extends out to become one of the basic functions of community life among the followers of Jesus. Part of how we learn to follow Jesus and model our behaviours on his, is by learning from those with more experience in following Jesus. The Church is the body of Christ, and when it is truly being so (which is not always, I’ll admit) it is the embodiment of Jesus’s life and ways in the world. We learn from one another what it means to follow Jesus and behave like Jesus.

You may have missed it, but this was stated clearly in tonight’s second bible reading, the one from Paul’s first letter to the Thessalonians. Speaking of how the people in Thessalonica became followers of Jesus, he says, “you became imitators of us and of the Lord,” and he goes on to say that subsequently, “you became an example to all the believers in Macedonia and in Achaia.” 

Do you hear that? They became followers of Jesus by “becoming imitators” of the established and experienced followers of Jesus, and through imitating them, they became imitators of the Lord. And then, as they themselves became experienced and proficient in following the ways of Jesus, they themselves became examples to others, so that others could model themselves on their example and thus become imitators of the Lord too.

This is entirely relevant to our consideration of what is going on in Israel and Gaza, because Paul says that this demonstration of learning by imitation among the Thessalonians is happening in a time of persecution. He says, “you became imitators of us and of the Lord, for in spite of persecution you received the word with joy inspired by the Holy Spirit.” 

So it seems almost certain that part of the imitation and modelling that Paul has in mind is their imitation of older Christians and of Jesus himself when they are faced with violence and persecution. When we look to the example of Jesus, do we see Jesus choosing to respond in kind without restraint to those who have treated him violently without restraint? No we do not. We see him continuing to pour forth love and mercy without restraint.

This is the ultimate freedom we are called to embrace in Christ. The freedom to separate ourselves from the compulsive cycles of violence and vengeance, the freedom to not have our actions and responses dictated by the actions and responses of our enemies. And we embrace that freedom by deliberately rejecting the modelling of our enemies and choosing to model ourselves instead on the one who has most perfectly modelled gracious restraint, undeserved mercy, determined de-escalation, and a willingness to absorb in his own body the hostility of his enemies so as to suck the hostility out of the system and help prevent it from continuing to ricochet around.

Friends, we are in one of those periods where turning on the news is particularly terrifying. It easily leaves us with the feeling that the Apostle describes, the feeling that a furious wrath is building up, and breaking out in various places, and threatening to escalate and engulf the whole world.

In the face of that, our first instinct is, of course, to pray, and that is a good thing and it has been very evidently happening in our daily prayer liturgies. But that is not the end of our calling. We are also called, like the Thessalonians, to be those who take our example from Jesus and so provide a model to the world of another way of responding to the escalating cycles of violence and vengeance, a way that de-escalates them by absorbing the hostility and refusing to ever reciprocate it. 

That is to be seen in both the ways we respond to those close at hand who want to make life difficult for us, and in the ways we imagine and talk about the big global conflicts. The two cannot be separated. We are not being called to model ourselves on Jesus in one sphere, and on the leader of the opposition or the Israeli Defence Forces in the other.

Though it is a common misunderstanding, when Jesus spoke of rendering to Caesar and rendering to God, he was not proposing that we compartmentalise life into two spheres with different rules for each. Rather he was asserting that the sphere of politics and empire and international relations exists only within the sphere of God’s cosmos, and thus, having been made in the image of God and called to live into that image by modelling ourselves on God made visible in Jesus, we are to render to God what is God’s in any and every sphere of life. 

The challenge of living that out is never more evident than when the threat of an escalating furious wrath seems to be upon us but, as Paul says, Jesus rescues us from that coming fury, and Jesus does that precisely by opening up a new pathway out of it, and walking that pathway all the way to death on a cross and out the other side into new life, and calling us to follow him. And in following him, in taking our example from him, lies the salvation of the world.

One Comment

  1. Vincent Michael Hodge

    Nathan’s sermon acutely points out that out that our behaviours should be dictated and defined by virtue and goodness. Our Christian God being such a model. A God as imaged in the Life Death and Resurrection of Jesus and now prolonged through the Holy Spirit active amongst us. We should not simply repay like for like.- an eye for an eye – despite that phrase once being a biblically endorsed improvement over the previous response of “unmitigated repayment disproportionate to the initial offence”.
    Curiously the First Reading comes from Exodus 33 and Moses is in the cleft of a rock – the cleft of the rock being like the blinkers for a horse in the Melbourne Cup – there is only one way in vision and that is forward. Sadly it also connotes that our horse is not in the lead- the view of God for the blinkered Moses is only seeing God directly ahead and, hence, only from His “behind”. That seems to fit with the first half of the Exodus passage in tonight’s reading – Moses says that unless you go with us, unless you show us your ways, then it is better we stay here in this place – maintain the status quo – stuck in the barrier with the gate wide opened but no movement forward – not in any direction for that matter.
    So maybe the Gospel passage is saying that in the Coin with Caesar’s image we can find an image of the Living God – a narrowed, very focused image but an image none the less- even an image in Caesar that is the revelation of God’s image! This is more apparent in the First reading that the roman catholic uses today – not Exodus but Isaiah 45. It is the image of the Pagan King, Cyrus, who freed the Hebrews from Exile in Babylon and allowed them to return to their homeland in Jerusalem.
    The text of Isaiah says at chapter 45(1): “……Thus says YHWH to his anointed, to Cyrus, whom he has taken by his right hand…”. A pagan is referenced as the “anointed/messiah of YHWH”. Might Caesar be another Cyrus? A messiah who is pagan? Apparently at their coronation, Babylonian kings grasped the hand of the god Bel-Marduk. In the Isaiah it is YHWH who grasps the hand of Cyrus. The Divine “I” speaks and anoints – not the reverse whereby Caesars defined themselves as gods and divinities. Might Jesus have answered the strange alliance of Pharisee and Herodian with something that had elements of positivity towards to Caesar?
    This Gospel has commonly een taken as the perfetc put-down by Jesus of an arrogant group of Pharisees and Herodians. Matthew describes their approach to jesus as one designed to trap and entangle and with malice. The punch line about “rendering” to Caesar is loaded with irony since Matthew has just told us the stories of the Wicked tenants who would not ‘render the fruit in due season” and also the story of the Wedding feast where the guy without the garment was entangled and tied up and thrown outside the camp to be devoured ,mercilessly. the first story is directed at the Questioners and the Secon story is directed at Jesus as the rejected one.

    There are heaps of puns and word plays in this Gospel story – a face mask was used on Greek theatre stages for different persons – hence the word “prosopon” meant both a mask and person. A hypocrite is a person who is “two faced”. In Greek text, Jesus asks what “eikon” is on the coin. Icons today represent not just mirror images but they communicate something of the “original” – the eikon not just represents but is something of the original. Much like in the letter to the Hebrews the word “character’ refers to a stamp that impressed an image on paper – the image being aligned in every way with the original. So the story develops from the image on the coin being simply a “mask” hiding the real character behind that mask through being two faced through to being an eikon – the presence of the Creator.
    Could Jesus be saying that in Caesar there is original creation? The concept of a Creator God was so inimical to the pagan concept of gods. Pagan gods were embedded in, and equivalent of, Nature – the separation of Creator and Nature was a concept so dear and so innovative to the definition of Israelite Faith! To suggest some “anointing” of Caesar by the God of Jesus would have put the Pharisaic and Herodian “teeth on edge” in no small way! Their vineyard was being desecrated and Jesus should have ben tied up and cast out! His deepest answer escaped the interrogators – does it escape us too?
    Should we entangle Nathan for his daring to suggest that we all have got it wrong when it comes to war and peace? Perhaps Rene Girard has something to say – imitate your enemy and you risk becoming like him!

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.